Contradictions of the Eternal Security Proponents....
Do they really believe in Eternal Security as they teach it?

 

1. Those who are not Calvinists, but believe in unconditional eternal security, teach that all infants go to heaven when they die. This is based on 2 Sam. 12:23. However, when the child gets older and sins, he now needs to be saved or born again or he is on his way to hell. So what we have is that a saved person as an infant who lost his salvation later in life needs to get it back again or he will suffer eternally in hell.

Think about it, with the above said, the eternal security advocates don't really believe in unconditional security. The once heaven-bound person becomes hell-bound and needs salvation, in their own theology!

2. Unconditional eternal security advocates will accuse those as not saved who reject their doctrine of eternal security. They contradict their own belief system, for if anyone who rejects their doctrine had a true moment of faith in Jesus and became biblically saved, then they are saved regardless what they later believe on various doctrines, including unconditional security. To remain rational and sound sane, they cannot logically say those who reject their doctrine are unsaved, for their own theology won't allow it. According to their theology, if one becomes a heretic or unsound in doctrine, but at one time had a true moment of faith in Jesus, then they are still saved. If they say otherwise is to logically deny their own doctrine.

____________________________________________________________